Prototype · sign-in and payment are mockups, nothing is charged

Should I pick apart my happy days?

· Source: Lyubomirsky, Sousa & Dickerhoof, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006

Last Saturday was close to perfect. Friends, a long lunch outside, a walk back in the late sun, nobody in a hurry. On Sunday you caught yourself going over it, trying to work out why it went so well. Was it the weather, the people, the fact that nothing was planned?

It feels like a sensible question. If you could find the recipe, you could make another day like it. Psychologists have tested what happens when people take their happiest moments apart like this, and the answer is a little surprising.

The other half of a study about bad days

Lyubomirsky, Sousa and Dickerhoof are better known for the first study in their paper. In it, students who wrote or talked about the worst experience of their lives were doing better a month later than students who only thought about it. Putting a painful event into words seemed to help.

The same paper has two more studies, and they turn the question round. What happens when the event is the happiest one instead?

In the second study, 111 students picked the best experience of their lives. They named things like getting into the college they wanted, meeting a partner, a sibling being born or a concert with friends. As before, each student either wrote about it, talked about it into a recorder or simply thought about it. They did this for 15 minutes a day, three days running.

Words helped with pain and got in the way of joy

Four weeks later, the result was the reverse of the one for bad experiences. This time the students who had only thought about their happiest moment ended up happier with their lives overall than the writers and the talkers.

The authors are careful about this. Mood and health showed no difference between the groups. They also couldn’t say for certain whether thinking helped or whether writing and talking hurt, because neither side differed clearly from a group that did nothing. The finding is about one thing, how satisfied people were with their lives, and it ran the opposite way from the study about painful events.

Replay or analyse

The third study tried to find out why. This time 112 students chose one of their happiest days. Half of them wrote about it and half thought about it. Within each half, some were asked to replay the day and others to analyse it. They did this for 8 minutes on three consecutive days.

The replay instructions asked people to go through the day as if rewinding a videotape and playing it back. Remember exactly what happened, in as much detail as you can. What did you do or say, and what did the others do or say? How did you feel at the time?

The analysis instructions asked for something quite different: a step-by-step breakdown of the day, with the focus on why and how it happened. People were asked what they could have done differently, and in what ways the happy event could be viewed differently.

What happened a month later

The group that wrote and analysed came out worst. Compared with the other three groups, they reported less personal growth, less self-acceptance, poorer health overall, poorer physical functioning and more pain.

The group that thought and replayed had the most positive emotion over the following weeks, although that difference was only marginally significant. There was one result the authors didn’t expect: the same replaying group felt a little less on top of daily life than the others, again only marginally. They admit that this one is hard to interpret.

So the picture is modest and a bit untidy, as real results often are. Taking a happy day apart in writing seemed to cost something. Simply living it again in your head seemed to keep the good feeling going.

Why understanding a good moment might spoil it

The authors explain this with an idea from other researchers, Wilson and Gilbert. When you analyse something good and make sense of it, it becomes ordinary. The mystery goes out of it. What was surprising and thrilling turns into a list of causes.

Replaying works the other way. Going back through the details again and again keeps the feelings around them alive. With a painful memory that’s exactly what you don’t want, but with a happy one it’s the whole point. In their discussion, the authors quote G. K. Chesterton:

Happiness is a mystery like religion, and should never be rationalized.

What the studies don’t settle

These were students around nineteen years old, reporting on their own feelings and health. Several findings were weak, and the authors themselves call for repeat studies. The third study tested writing and thinking only. Speaking a happy memory out loud while replaying it, rather than analysing it, wasn’t part of that test, so we don’t know how it would compare.

It also matters that analysing a bad day was helpful in the same paper. The lesson isn’t “never think about your life”. It’s narrower than that: the step-by-step “why” seems useful for pain and less useful for joy.

Keeping a good day without dissecting it

What follows is our advice, drawn from the replay instructions the researchers used.

Go back to one moment, not the whole day. Then stay with the details: the light, what someone said, the taste of the food, how you felt standing there. If you catch yourself asking why it went so well, gently turn back to what it was like.

Here is an invented example. Nina wants to remember Saturday’s lunch. Her first thought is an explanation: “It worked because we didn’t plan anything.” She sets that aside and replays it instead. The bread arrived still warm. Her friend Ilse laughed so hard at a story about a lost cat that she had to put her glass down. The table wobbled, and nobody fixed it. That’s all. Nothing is explained, and the afternoon comes back more clearly than any reason would.

When good days stop feeling good

Sometimes the problem isn’t too much analysis. It’s that nothing feels good at all, even on days that should, and that has gone on for weeks. That’s worth talking about with your doctor or a therapist rather than trying to fix with a memory exercise. A diary can show how long it has been going on. It can’t treat it.

Try it tonight

  1. Tonight, pick one good moment from today or this week.
  2. Replay it like a film: what you saw, what people said, how you felt right then.
  3. If you start explaining why it was good, let the question go and return to the details.

Halflight keeps the details of a good day under its date, so later you can play the moment back instead of explaining it.

Halflight